Lilia Osterloh vs Amanda Coetzer Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W W L L L L L
Form
W L L L L W L W L LHead-To-Head: Osterloh 1 - 1 Coetzer
They have played 4 sets in total, with Osterloh winning 2 and Coetzer winning 2. The last match between Osterloh and Coetzer was at the Wimbledon - London, 26-06-2000, Second, Grass with Lilia Osterloh getting the victory 7-6(0) 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Lilia Osterloh | 1 |
| Amanda Coetzer | 1 |
Wimbledon - London(26-06-2000)
7
6
6
2
| Osterloh | Stats | Coetzer |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 74 | Highest Rank | 12 |
| 47 | Age | 53 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 3 | Titles | 10 |
| 50% (306-312) | Career Total W/L | 63% (576-340) |
| $119,420 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 1 |
| 1 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Rybakina VS Svitolina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Dzumhur VS Arnaldi PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
28 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(0) 6-2 | |||||
| 6-4 6-2 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 19 | Games Won | 20 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Lilia Osterloh Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-7(0) 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats 
Kai-Chen Chang
Player
Lilia Osterloh
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
1
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
5
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
44%
(
30 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christina Mchale
Player
Lilia Osterloh
68%
(
57 of
84)
1st Serve %
74%
(
62 of
84)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
31%
(
26 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
84)
93
Total Points Won
75
|
6-1 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Stephanie Cohen-Aloro
Player
Lilia Osterloh
61%
(
66 of
109)
1st Serve %
50%
(
57 of
113)
10
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
71%
(
47 of
66)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
38%
(
41 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
49 of
113)
117
Total Points Won
105
|
6-7(5) 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Christina Mchale
Player
Lilia Osterloh
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
46%
(
31 of
68)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lilia Osterloh
Player
Ahsha Rolle
59%
(
48 of
81)
1st Serve %
52%
(
38 of
73)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
1
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
34 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
82
Total Points Won
72
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lilia Osterloh
Player
Misaki Doi
47%
(
47 of
100)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
88)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
40 of
55)
64%
(
34 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
41 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
88)
93
Total Points Won
95
|
6-3 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-1 6-7(4) 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Amanda Coetzer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Dinara Safina
Player
Amanda Coetzer
54%
(
44 of
82)
1st Serve %
71%
(
46 of
65)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
39%
(
15 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
46%
(
38 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amanda Coetzer
Player
Tara Snyder
72%
(
52 of
72)
1st Serve %
69%
(
31 of
45)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
44%
(
32 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 4-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-6(4) 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
| R1 | 4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R3 |
Stats
Nadezda Petrova
Player
Amanda Coetzer
44%
(
18 of
41)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Amanda Coetzer
Player
Barbara Schett
57%
(
62 of
108)
1st Serve %
60%
(
75 of
124)
1
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
6
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
48 of
75)
57%
(
26 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
37%
(
40 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
54 of
124)
122
Total Points Won
110
|
3-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 50% (306/312) | Win/Loss | 63% (576/340) |
| 50% (699/711) | Sets Win/Loss | 60% (1248/834) |
| 50% (6393/6439) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (10200/8645) |
| 51% (151/146) | Hard Win/Loss | 64% (269/152) |
| 39% (53/82) | Clay Win/Loss | 69% (196/89) |
| 57% (71/53) | Indoor Hard W/L | 53% (69/60) |
| 50% (31/31) | Grass Win/Loss | 47% (15/17) |
| 0.03 | Aces Per Game | 0 |
| 200 | Aces Total | 3 |
| 0.07 | Double Faults Per Game | 0 |
| 423 | Total Double Faults | 15 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 469.53 | Average Opponent Rank | 286.89 |
| 60% (4745/7862) | 1st Serve % | 69% (404/583) |
| 60% (2855/4745) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (242/404) |
| 43% (1345/3141) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (89/179) |
| 46% (437/940) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (33/67) |
| 44% (3497/7889) | Return Points Win % | 45% (271/597) |
| 39% (29/46) | Slam W/L | 64% (77/43) |
| 45% (32/39) | Masters W/L | 57% (44/33) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 65% (15/8) |
| 46% (121/142) | Main Tour W/L | 63% (168/99) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 59% (115/81) | Challenger W/L | 76% (51/16) |
| 0% (0/0) | Futures W/L | 55% (27/22) |
| 49% (299/609) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (569/907) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 45% (52/116) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (57/100) |
| 48% (88/182) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (157/261) |
| 84% (311/260) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (541/493) |
| 15% (311/48) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (541/48) |
| 13% (306/41) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (371/80) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
